Inspection Report
La Merced Mexican Kitchen
855 W UNIVERSITY DR MESA AZ 85201
FD-10800
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
Food Routine Inspection
12/11/2023
D
4
Completed
Violations
Violation #: 1
Description: Person in Charge Present, Demonstrates Knowledge, and Performs Duties
Comments:
Priority Foundation-2-103.11 (A-N) and (P), Pf: Person-In-Charge-Duties; Performs Assigned Duties
Insufficient knowledge was observed during inspection due to multiple priority violations seen and no worker onsite with certified food manager certificate.
NOTE: Individual in charge should have food manager certification at all times of operation.
Correct By: Correct Prior To Next Routine Inspection
Violation #: 10
Description: Adequate Handwashing Sinks, Properly Supplied and Accessible
Comments:
Priority Foundation-5-205.11, Pf: Using a Handwashing Sink-Operation and Maintenance. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4573/AMC-Toolbox---Handwashing.
Observed handwashing sink in front register area with dirty cups placed on it. Discussed with person in charge that the handwashing sink must be accessible at all times and not used for anything but handwashing. Cups were removed from sink
Correct By: Corrected At Time Of Inspection
Violation #: 16
Repeat Violation
Description: Food-Contact Surfaces: Cleaned and Sanitized
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-4-501.114, P: Manual and Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Chemical Sanitization- Temperature, pH, Concentration and Hardness. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4574/AMC-Toolbox---Food-Contact-Surfaces.
Observed dishwasher dispensing 0 ppm of chlorine after multiple runs. Discussed with PIC chlorine should be 50-100 ppm. Facility will use three compartment sink until dishwasher can dispense at 50-100 ppm.
Correct By: Corrected At Time Of Inspection,Repeat Violations: 1st
Violation #: 20
Description: Proper Cooling Time and Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.14, P: Cooling. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4617/AMC-Toolbox---Cooling.
Observed salsa holding 50-54 F in large closed container, per PIC salsa was made the night prior. Discussed with PIC that salsa must be cooled to 41 F or below before placing in large container and closing it. .Ensure foods are cooled to 70 F within 2 hours, then cooled to 41 F within 4 hours. Salsa was discarded.
Correct By: Corrected At Time Of Inspection
Violation #: 21
Description: Proper Hot Holding Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(1), P: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4614/AMC-Toolbox---Hot-Holding.
Observed rice holding 117-128 F on hot holding line, per PIC rice was reheated prior to placing on line. Discussed with PIC that rice must be held at 135 or above. Rice was reheated and placed back on line.
:
Violation #: 28
Description: Toxic Substances Properly Identified, Stored, and Used; Held for Retail Sale, Properly Stored
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-7-202.12, P: Conditions of Use
Observed concentration of chlorine in sanitizer buckets above 100 ppm. Chlorine sanitizer for use in wiping food contact surfaces must be maintained between 50-100 ppm. Concentrations over 100 ppm could be toxic if consumed. Bucket was remade at 50 ppm.
Correct By: Corrected At Time Of Inspection
Comments/Details
A pattern of non-compliance is developing for Priority violation # [14 ], [4-501.114], which has been noted during this inspection. An Active Managerial Control Intervention Visit was offered to the person in charge. Failure to correct repeat violations may result in legal action.
Verified Food Service Worker Certificates at the time of inspection.
No County legal action will result from this inspection.
Report sent by email.
Award: D,Embargo Lbs: 50,Food Handler Cards: 4,Number of Employees: 4,Review Complete: CHECKED,Review Notes: QA - TH,Signer: Anna Sanjuan
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.