Inspection Report
IHOP
4501 E CACTUS RD PHOENIX AZ 85032
FD-21166
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
CI Food Routine Inspection
5/19/2026
B
1
Re-inspection required
Violations
Violation #: 47
Description: Food and Non-Food-Contact Surfaces Cleanable, Properly Designed, Constructed and Used
Comments:
4-402.11 - Core: Fixed Equipment, Spacing or Sealing-Installation Addl Notes: Observed no caulk or caulk in disrepair at the 3-compartment sink and the drainboards for the dish machine. Discussed sealing the sinks to the wall. Equipment that is stationary (not easily moved) and subject to moisture must be sealed and maintained to prevent pathogen growth and the harborage of insects and rodents. Corrective Action: Correct prior to next routine inspection.
Violation #: 52
Description: Sewage and Waste Water Properly Disposed
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-5-402.13 - Priority: Conveying Sewage
Addl Notes: Observed standing water in the mop sink that is located in the outside area. Reviewed the estimate from the plumber, which indicates that the p-trap and drain must be replaced. Observed all drains and fixtures in the kitchen and dining room (restrooms) to be draining properly. Discussed the requirement to close the kitchen if an active backup happens and waste water begins to flow out of the sink and onto the floor. PIC will use the floor sink in the dish pit to empty the mop sink water. Re-inspection 3 days. Corrective Action: Correct prior to re-inspection.
Comments/Details
No County legal action will result from this inspection.
Discussed removing the y-valve from the faucet at the mop sink. Emailed the chemical dispenser handout. Discussed repairing the wall in the server's area. Calibrated thermometer.
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.