Inspection Report
Taco Chelo
521 S COLLEGE AV TEMPE AZ 85281
FD-23-03779
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
Food Routine Inspection
4/29/2026
Not Participating
3
Completed
Violations
Violation #: 8
Description: Hands Clean and Properly Washed
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-2-301.14 - Priority: When to Wash. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4573/AMC-Toolbox: Handwashing.
Addl Notes: Observed employee cooking meat, take off gloves and toss into the garbage. The gloves fell on the ground and the same employee picked up the gloves and threw them away again and then put on new gloves without washing hands. Discussed the importance of proper hand washing procedures with the person-in-charge (PIC). Proper handwashing procedure is to rinse hands with warm water, scrub with soap for 10-15 seconds, rinse with warm water, dry with approved drying provision, and turn off in a manner to prevent re-contamination of hands. Entire process should take approximately 20 seconds for full and proper handwashing to prevent spread of pathogens and contamination. Hands must be washed at any time contamination occurs and when changing tasks, such as pickup things off the ground, taking off gloves and before donning new gloves. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Violation #: 21
Description: Proper Hot Holding Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(1) - Priority: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4614/AMC-Toolbox---Hot-Holding.
Addl Notes: Observed carne asada cooked and in the hot holding unit by the rice cooker on the main line at 126*F. Per PIC the carne asada was cooked and placed in the unit 1 hour prior to inspection. Discussed with PIC Except during preparation, cooking, cooling or when time is used as a control all TCS foods must be maintained at 135°F or above. The carne asada improperly hot held were reheated to 165°F at time of inspection. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Violation #: 22
Description: Proper Cold Holding Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(2) and (B) - Priority: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Cold Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you.https://www.maricopa.gov/4576/AMC-Toolbox---Cold-Holding.
Addl Notes: Observed the short reach-in refrigerator with several TCS items at an internal temperatures of 45*F to 47*F. Discussed with PIC All TCS foods improperly cold held in the unit for less than 4 hours were relocated to alternative functioning refrigeration unit to rapidly cool to 41°F at time of inspection. All TCS foods improperly cold held in the unit for more than 4 hours were embargoed and voluntarily discarded by PIC at time of inspection. Those items were heavy cream, queso and crema. Unit was found to be an internal temperature of 49*F at time of inspection. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Violation #: 33
Description: Proper Cooling Methods Used; Adequate Equipment for Temperature Control
Comments:
4-301.11 - Priority Foundation: Cooling, Heating, and Holding Capacities-Equipment. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4617/AMC-Toolbox---Cooling. Addl Notes: In the back prep area, the short reach in unit was found to be an internal temperature of 49*F at time of inspection measured with a min/max thermometer. Discussed with PIC cold holding equipment must have the capacity to maintain TCS foods at 41°F or below. Must repair cold holding equipment such that it maintains TCS foods at 41°F or below. Employee discovered that the unit became unplugged from a charcoal delivery from earlier in the day by placing bags on the cord. Employee plugged unit back in and the unit was at 40*F by end of inspection. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
3-501.15 (A) - Priority Foundation: Cooling Methods. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4617/AMC-Toolbox---Cooling. Addl Notes: Observed avocado salsa in the top and bottom of the prep table of the main line at 52*F. Also observed chopped lettuce (in 2 metal pans) on the top part of the prep table with an internal temperature of 50*F measured with a probing thermometer. Discussed with PIC all TCS foods must be cooled in: uncovered/loosely covered, shallow containers less than 4 inches deep, in equipment designed to rapidly cool, by using an ice bath, by using ice as an ingredient, or another effective means. Discussed a prep table is not designed to cool items and all items shall be placed in the unit at 41* or less. Per PIC the avocado salsa and the chopped lettuce were made and placed in the unit 30 minutes prior to inspection. The items were placed in adequate refrigeration to rapidly cool at time of inspection. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Comments/Details
No County legal action will result from this inspection.
Of Note: Discussed with PIC 1) to store ice buckets and clean containers upside down when not in use on a smooth and cleanable surface. 2) allow adequate spacing in a unit to ensure proper airflow and to prevent the bottom row from airflow blockage. 3) ROP guidance was provided to PIC at time of inspection. Discussed HACCP Plans and variances are NOT required if sealing a product in a bag using ROP method for less than 48 hours. Holding in ROP bag for more than 48 hours will require a HACCP plan/variance.
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.