Inspection Report
Carniceria Los Reyes
1603 N 16TH ST PHOENIX AZ 85006
FD-37386
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
Food Routine Inspection
1/31/2025
C
2
Completed
Violations
Violation #: 20
Description: Proper Cooling Time and Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.14 - Priority: Cooling. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4617/AMC-Toolbox---Cooling.
Addl Notes: Observed 3 containers of cooked beans (50*F) with date mark of 1/30, container of guacamole with cut tomatoes (47*F) made more than 4 hours prior, 2 containers of red salsa (48*F and 56*F) with date mark of 1/27 and 1/30, respectively, and container of salsa verde (44*F-46*F) with date mark of 1/30 in facility walk-in. All TCS foods improperly cooled were discarded by PIC at time of inspection. Ambient temperature of walk-in was at 38*F, via minimum/maximum thermometer. Cooked TCS foods must be cooled from 135°F to 70°F within 2 hours, and from 70°F to 41°F within 4 hours for a total of 6 hours for cooling. TCS foods made at ambient room temperature must cool from 70°F to 41°F within 4 hours. Discussed with PIC use of metal containers, shallow pans, ice wands, ice as an ingredient, and location in walk-in to facilitate rapid cooling. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Violation #: 21
Repeat Violation
Description: Proper Hot Holding Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(1) - Priority: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4614/AMC-Toolbox---Hot-Holding.
Addl Notes: Observed cooked jalapenos (99*F), grilled onions (90*F), cooked rice (104*F), cooked steak (124*F), cooked beans (104*F), and cooked chicken stew (104*F) in hot-holding unit located across from hot holding tabletop. PIC stated items were placed in hot holding unit approximately two hours prior. All TCS foods improperly hot held were discarded by PIC at time of inspection. Ambient temperature of unit was 112*F, via minimum/maximum thermometer. Unit temperature was adjusted and ambient temperature was found to be at 140*F at time of inspection. Observed cooked chicken (105*F) and cooked ribs (81*F) in hot holding tabletop. PIC stated items were placed in hot holding tabletop approximately an hour and a half prior. Chicken and ribs were reheated to 165*F at time of inspection. Ambient temperature of unit was 132*F. Unit temperature was adjusted and ambient temperature was found to be at 145*F at time of inspection. Except during preparation, cooking, cooling or when time is used as a control all TCS foods must be maintained at 135°F or above. 2ND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Violation #: 25
Description: Consumer Advisory Provided for Raw or Undercooked Food
Comments:
3-603.11 - Priority Foundation: Consumption of Animal Foods that are Raw, Undercooked, or Not Otherwise Processed to Eliminate Pathogens. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4125/Food-SafetyOperator-Resources. Addl Notes: Observed establishment offers sale of ceviche containing raw shrimp with no consumer advisory present. Offering and serving undercooked proteins requires an approved consumer advisory at all points of sale; and must contain an approved disclosure method and reminder statement. PIC added a consumer advisory at time of inspection. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Comments/Details
No County legal action will result from this inspection.
Discussed kitchen flooring and circulating air in walk-in.
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.