Inspection Report
Original Chop Shop
16205 N SCOTTSDALE RD SCOTTSDALE AZ 85254
FD-59783
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
Food Routine Inspection
5/16/2025
Not Participating
3
Completed
Violations
Violation #: 8
Description: Hands Clean and Properly Washed
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-2-301.14 - Priority: When to Wash. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4573/AMC-Toolbox: Handwashing.
Addl Notes: In the kitchen, observed a chef crack raw unpasteurized shelled eggs with gloved hands, then continue food service work (handle sliced deli meat) without first washing their hand. Observed chef scratch their face with gloved hands then change gloves and continue food service work without washing their hands. Predefined Comment: Discussed the importance of proper hand washing and when hand washing is required with the person-in-charge (PIC). Hands must be washed at any time contamination occurs and when changing tasks. Predefined Comment: After instruction, employee properly washed hands at time of inspection. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Violation #: 16
Description: Food-Contact Surfaces: Cleaned and Sanitized
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-4-602.11 (A-D) - Priority: Equipment Food-Contact Surfaces and Utensils-Frequency. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4574/AMC-Toolbox---Food-Contact-Surfaces.
Addl Notes: Observed a chef drop a chef’s knife on the ground in the ware washing area. Observed the chef pick up the knife, rinse off the knife under running water at the three-compartment sink, and then put the knife on a magnetic holder next to the grill for storage/ later use. No full wash, rinse, and sanitizer observed. The sanitizer was not set up at the three-compartment sink. The knife was washed, rinsed, and sanitized at time of inspection after instruction. Food contact surfaces must be washed, rinsed, and sanitized any time contamination may have occurred. Discussed importance of fully washing, rinsing, and sanitizing food contact surfaces. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Violation #: 21
Repeat Violation
Description: Proper Hot Holding Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(1) - Priority: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4614/AMC-Toolbox---Hot-Holding.
Addl Notes: Observed cooked chicken hot holding in steam well in the rear prep area. Internal temperature of the cooked chicken measured between 127-132°F. Predefined Comment: Except during preparation, cooking, cooling or when time is used as a control all TCS foods must be maintained at 135°F or above. After discussion with the person in charge it was determined the chicken was fully cooked an hour ago and had been hot holding since. Predefined Comment: All TCS foods improperly hot held were reheated to 165°F at time of inspection. Ensure steam wells are set up properly prior to being used to hot hold TCS foods. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection. Repeat Violation: 3rd.
Comments/Details
Predefined Comment: Due to the violations noted on this inspection report, County legal action may result from this inspection.
Discussed adding * symbol next to avacado toast(sunny side up eggs) on the digitial menu. Establishment's printed menu has the * symbol/Disclosure for the consumer advisory reminder statement.
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.