Inspection Report
The Watermark at Morrison Ranch
3333 E MORRISON RANCH PKWY GILBERT AZ 85296
FD-72866
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
CI Food Routine Inspection
8/4/2025
Not Participating
2
Completed
Violations
Violation #: 8
Repeat Violation
Description: Hands Clean and Properly Washed
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-2-301.14 - Priority: When to Wash. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4573/AMC-Toolbox: Handwashing.
Addl Notes: 2ND CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION Observed employee use gloved hands to load dish racks with soiled dishes. Employee then removed gloves and began putting away clean dishes, without washing hands first. Also observed cook use gloved hands to handle raw hamburger patties, remove gloves and begin to don a new pair without washing hands. All employees properly washed hands. PIC will retrain employees on proper handwashing and when to wash. The hands are particularly important in transmitting foodborne pathogens. Food employees with dirty hands and/or fingernails may contaminate the food being prepared. Therefore, any activity which may contaminate the hands must be followed by thorough handwashing in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Food Code. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Violation #: 22
Repeat Violation
Description: Proper Cold Holding Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(2) and (B) - Priority: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Cold Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you.https://www.maricopa.gov/4576/AMC-Toolbox---Cold-Holding.
Addl Notes: 4TH CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION Observed baked potatoes and cream pies cold holding in the walk-in cooler with internal temperatures of 46-48F, probe thermometer, verified by person in charge (PIC) and cooked chicken wings and hot dogs cold holding in the cook-line sandwich cooler with internal temperatures of 58-60F. According to PIC, the cream pies may have warmed up during lunch service and will be cooled to 41F or less. PIC is unsure of how long the other TCS foods have been in the danger zone (41-135F) and suspects that a faulty gasket in the refrigerated drawer caused the chicken wings and hot dogs to have an increased temperature. PIC voluntarily discarded the potatoes, chicken wings, and hot dogs, see embargo form. Discussed the importance of maintaining cold food at 41F or less to limit pathogen growth and avoid causing foodborne illness. Reviewed temperature logs and procedures for monitoring temperatures. PIC will retrain employees to routinely monitor holding temperatures. Except during preparation, cooking, cooling, or when time is used as a control all TCS food must be maintained at 41°F or less. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Violation #: 33
Repeat Violation
Description: Proper Cooling Methods Used; Adequate Equipment for Temperature Control
Comments:
3-501.15 (A) - Priority Foundation: Cooling Methods. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4617/AMC-Toolbox---Cooling. Addl Notes: 2ND CONSECUTIVE Observed recently prepped tuna salad tightly covered in a 400 metal pan in the walk-in cooler. Also observed tightly covered, deep pans of recently sliced tomatoes cooling in a reach-in on the cook-line. PIC placed the tuna salad in a 200 pan, loosely covered, and the sliced tomatoes were placed into the walk-in freezer, loosely covered. Reviewed the cooling handout on the walk-in cooler door. TCS foods must be cooled in: uncovered/loosely covered, shallow containers less than 4 inches deep, in equipment designed to rapidly cool, by using an ice bath, by using ice as an ingredient, or another effective means. PIC review cooling methods with employees and will monitor the times, temperatures, and procedures. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Comments/Details
A pattern of non-compliance for Priority #8 : 2-301.14: Priority: When to Wash. violation has been noted during this inspection. An Active Managerial Control Intervention Visit was offered to the person in charge. Failure to correct repeat violations may result in legal action.
Emailed the legal process to the person in charge: "Pattern of non-compliance".
Due to the violations noted on this inspection report, County legal action may result from this inspection.
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.