Inspection Report
State 48 Brewery
13823 W BELL RD SURPRISE AZ 85374
FD-75503
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
Food Routine Inspection
6/5/2024
D
1
Completed
Violations
Violation #: 22
Repeat Violation
Description: Proper Cold Holding Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(2) and (B), P: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Cold Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4576/AMC-Toolbox---Cold-Holding.
Raw beef, cooked meatloaf, cooked pork, cooked beef, cooked turkey, deli ham, and sliced cheese with internal temperatures between 46 degrees F and 50 degrees F cold holding in two-drawer cooler under the cook-top. Ambient temperature of the unit was found to be 49.1 degrees F using a min/max thermometer. PIC stated that the unit was at 41 degrees F when they arrived at 10am this morning (approximately 2 hours before inspectors arrival.) All TCS foods were moved to the walk-in to rapidly cool to 41 degrees F or below. PIC will call technician to service the unit. Ensure all cold holding TCS items are held at a temperature of 41 degrees F or below.
Correct By: Corrected At Time Of Inspection,Repeat Violations: 4th
Violation #: 47
Description: Food and Non-Food-Contact Surfaces Cleanable, Properly Designed, Constructed and Used
Comments:
Core-4-501.11, C: Good Repair and Proper Adjustment-Equipment.
Raw beef, cooked meatloaf, cooked pork, cooked beef, cooked turkey, deli ham, and sliced cheese with internal temperatures between 46 degrees F and 50 degrees F cold holding in two-drawer cooler under the cook-top. Ambient temperature of the unit was found to be 49.1 degrees F using a min/max thermometer (see violation 20.) PIC stated that the two-drawer cooler will not be used until it can be repaired. Establishment has sufficient cooler capacities to operate safely until the unit is repaired. All cold holding units need to have an ambient temperature below 41 degrees F.
Core-4-101.19, C: Nonfood-Contact Surfaces.
Inside prep tables on the line had a build up of food debris and soil. Ensure they are cleaned at a frequency to prevent the accumulation of soil. Clean by next routine inspection.
Correct By: Correct Prior To Next Routine Inspection
Comments/Details
Due to the violations noted on this inspection report, County legal action may result from this inspection.
Establishment on their fourth consecutive cold holding violation.
Inspection rights reviewed with Matthew C.
Inspection report emailed.
Discussed personal items and thawing.
On July 1st, 2023, the Environmental Services Department started emailing permit card(s) and permit invoice(s) to permittees. We need a current and accurate email address on file to ensure you receive a copy of your permit card and invoice(s) upon renewal. If you are unsure whether your email address is accurate, you may:
• Contact your inspector using the phone number or email on your last inspection report to review, or
• Contact the Department using the email addresses below,
o Envquickservicerestaurants@maricopa.gov (facilities such as fast-food)
o Envfullservicerestaurants@maricopa.gov (facilities that are full-service restaurants)
o Envretailgrocery@maricopa.gov (facilities like grocery stores or retail food markets)
o Envspecialtyprograms@maricopa.gov (mobile food/special events/plan review)
If you need to update your email address and/or other contact information, please submit an administrative change request form at the below website https://www.maricopa.gov/FormCenter/Environmental-Services-16/Administrative-Change-Request-Form-181.
Award: D,Food Manager Licenses: 1,Signer: Matthew Campbell
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.