Inspection Report
Nekter Juice Bar
2832 N POWER RD MESA AZ 85215
FD-80976
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
Food Routine Inspection
6/5/2024
Not Participating
1
Completed
Violations
Violation #: 1
Description: Person in Charge Present, Demonstrates Knowledge, and Performs Duties
Comments:
Priority Foundation-2-102.11(A), B) and (C)(1), (4)-(16), Pf: Demonstration; Demonstration of Knowledge
Observed No personal with a certified food protection manager onsite at time of inspection. No CFPM has been documented numerous times in previous inspections. Upon addressing issue of juicer sanitizing intervals and establishments attempt to use time control by the hour on cut leafy green product, it was discovered that temperature abuse is occuring were product is being rotated and saved after time has expired and not discarded. Items temperature abused for more than 4 hours must be discarded.
Correct By: Corrected At Time Of Inspection
Violation #: 16
Description: Food-Contact Surfaces: Cleaned and Sanitized
Comments:
Priority Foundation-4-601.11(A), Pf: Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4574/AMC-Toolbox---Food-Contact-Surfaces.
Observed Juice machine with no documentation of cleaning intervals. Staff stated juicer is washed rinsed and sanitized at closing. Juicer had parsley, spinach, and kale inside housing. Juicer dissembled and cleaned at time of inspection
Correct By: Corrected At Time Of Inspection
Violation #: 22
Description: Proper Cold Holding Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(2) and (B), P: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Cold Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4576/AMC-Toolbox---Cold-Holding.
Observed leafed Kale sitting out at ambient temperature. Kale was temped at 61*f degrees. employee confirmed Kale had been placed out within the past 2 hours. Kale sent to walk-in to cool. No time control policy was found for cut leafy greens.
Correct By: Corrected At Time Of Inspection
Comments/Details
No County legal action will result from this inspection.
Report emailed
Advisory is set for 6/11 to meet with management to establish a time control policy for juicer and cut leafy greens
Core-2-102.12(A), C: Certified Food Protection Manager
Award: Not Participating,Review Complete: CHECKED,Review Notes: QA - TH (Fixed items 23 - 27 at request from EHS).,Signer: Madison Johnson
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.