Inspection Report
Valleywise
2601 E ROOSEVELT ST PHOENIX AZ 85008
FD-85208
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
CI Food Routine Inspection
8/11/2026
B
1
Completed
Violations
Violation #: 21
Description: Proper Hot Holding Temperatures
Comments:
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(1) - Priority: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4614/AMC-Toolbox---Hot-Holding.
Addl Notes: Observed pans of cooked and cubed beef hot holding in the hot holding cabinet in the build your own station of the cafeteria with internal temperatures of 108-118F, and alfredo sauce and marinara sauce hot holding in the hot cabinet of the pasta station with internal temperatures of 62-104F, probe thermometer, verified by PIC. According to PIC, the cooked beef and sauces are prepared in the main kitchen and transported to the cafeteria. The beef and sauces are held under temperature control until transferred to the serving wells, which starts the time as a control holding. While under temperature control, hot foods must maintain 135F or more. The beef and sauces started hot holding about an hour prior to inspection. PIC instructed employees to reheat the foods to 165F. PIC will retrain employees to ensure that TCS foods are held at 135F or above. Maintaining cooked TCS foods at 135F or more during hot holding prevents significant regrowth of heat-injured microorganisms and prevents recontamination with bacteria that are newly introduced. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Violation #: 33
Description: Proper Cooling Methods Used; Adequate Equipment for Temperature Control
Comments:
3-501.15 (A) - Priority Foundation: Cooling Methods. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4617/AMC-Toolbox---Cooling. Addl Notes: Observed cooked sausage links and patties from breakfast cooling in the refrigerated drawers in the grill station (102-110F cooling for 1.5 hours), and several recently prepped items from cold or ambient temperature such as sliced deli turkey, house-made egg salad, and cooked chicken in tightly covered, deep plastic containers on a rack in the walk-in cooler (48-53F cooling for 2 hours or less). The prepped items on the rack in the walk-in cooler were prepped in the main kitchen to be held under time as a control once lunch service starts. According to PIC, the procedure is to use the blast chiller in the main kitchen to cool the TCS foods on the rack and the sausage observed cooling in the drawer. Employee placed the TCS foods onto trays/shallow pans as necessary and placed into the freezer in the main kitchen to rapidly cool to 41F or less. PIC will instruct employees to no longer cool the sausage from breakfast because it is held under time as a control and must be discarded, or will remove the sausage from the time policy and instead use temperature. Discussed proper cooling methods and containers. Deep, covered, plastic pans are not effective containers for heat transfer and air circulation. Shallow, metal and loosely covered containers facilitate heat transfer. Reach-ins and prep coolers are designed to maintain food temperatures and may not cool rapidly. TCS foods starting at ambient temperature have 4 hours to cool to 41F or less. Hot foods are required to cool from 135F to 41F in 6 hours: 135F-70F in the first 2 hours; 70F-41F in the next 4 hours. Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection.
Comments/Details
No County legal action will result from this inspection.
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.