Inspection Report
Peter Piper
4315 W GLENDALE AVE GLENDALE AZ 85301
FD-88924
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
CI Food Routine Inspection
11/21/2024
B
1
Re-inspection required
Violations
Violation #: 1
Description: Person in Charge Present, Demonstrates Knowledge, and Performs Duties
Comments:
Person in charge failed to produce food manager certification and answer questions regarding cold holding temperatures, cooling times and temperatures, sanitizing solution strength and temperatures, or describe the symptoms or diseases associated with foodborne illness. A food manager must be present at all times and be able to demonstrate knowledge of foodborne disease prevention. General manager stated food manager certification online exam will be looked into for staff. District manager to follow up with inspector with documentation.
2-102.11(A-B) and (C)(1), (4)-(16) - Priority Foundation: Demonstration; Demonstration of Knowledge Addl Notes: Corrective Action: Correct prior to next routine inspection. Predefined Comment: A person-in-charge is required onsite at all times, must demonstrate adequate knowledge, and perform all duties as required.
Violation #: 2
Description: Certified Food Protection Manager
Comments:
No person on duty with a food manager certification. Person in charge to coordinate with general manager on scheduling exam.
2-102.12(A) - Core: Certified Food Protection Manager. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these resources on our website. https://www.maricopa.gov/5114/Food-Restaurants Addl Notes: Corrective Action: Correct prior to next routine inspection. Predefined Comment: A Certified Food Protection Manager (CFPM) is required to be on the premises during all hours of operation.
Violation #: 22
Repeat Violation
Description: Proper Cold Holding Temperatures
Comments:
Boneless wings and ranch in small cold holding unit next to fryer with an internal temperature of 46-55*F. All cold temperature controlled foods should be held at 41*F or below. Person in charge voluntarily discarded wings and ranch. THIRD CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(2) and (B) - Priority: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Cold Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you.https://www.maricopa.gov/4576/AMC-Toolbox---Cold-Holding.
Addl Notes: Corrective Action: Corrected at time of inspection. Predefined Comment: All TCS foods improperly cold held were discarded by PIC at time of inspection. Predefined Comment: Except during preparation, cooking, cooling or when time is used as a control all TCS foods must be maintained at 41°F or below. Eggs not treated to destroy Salmonellae can be stored in equipment that maintains an ambient air temperature of 45°F or below.
Violation #: 33
Repeat Violation
Description: Proper Cooling Methods Used; Adequate Equipment for Temperature Control
Comments:
Small reach in refrigerator near fryers with an ambient temperature of 44*F. Refrigerators should be held at a temperature of 41*F to hold temperature-controlled foods. General manager mentioned they put in a service request and will be serviced soon. Establishment to provide work order invoice once completed. Re-Inspection to occur by 12/2/2024. No temperature controlled
foods to be held in unit until unit can hold an ambient temperature of 41*F or below. All foods to be held in walk-in at 41*F. Out
of order sign placed on unit. THIRD CONSECUTIVE VIOLATION
4-301.11 - Priority Foundation: Cooling, Heating, and Holding Capacities-Equipment. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4617/AMC-Toolbox---Cooling. Addl Notes: Corrective Action: Correct prior to re-inspection. Predefined Comment: Cold holding equipment must have the capacity to maintain TCS foods at 41°F or below. Must repair cold holding equipment such that it maintains TCS foods at 41°F or below.
Comments/Details
Predefined Comment: Due to the violations noted on this inspection report, County legal action may result from this inspection.
Audit of food handlers conducted and 15 of 23 employee certification were available. Manager to reach out and provide by next routine inspection.
Discussed establishment procedures regarding: temperature logs, handwashing, jewelry, sanitizing temperatures, maintenance and cleaning frequency to ice machine, cooling times and temperatures
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.