Inspection Report
Rosso
2 E JEFFERSON ST PHOENIX AZ 85004
FD-91331
Food Establishment - Eating & Drinking
Re-Inspection
12/6/2023
R
0
Re-Inspection Completed
Violations
Violation #: 14
Repeat Violation
Description: Required Records Available: Shellstock Tags, Parasite Destruction
Comments:
Priority Foundation-3-202.18 (A), Pf: Shellstock Identification; Tags Present. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4619/AMC-Toolbox---Approved-Source.---Observed the establishment having fresh mussels but still not being able to provide the tags for the past batches sold in the last 90 days. Employee states they will obtain them and date them accordingly. Discussed the importance of maintain and retaining tags for 90 calendar days from date recorded on tag or label (when the last mussel is sold) using an approved record keeping system that keeps records in a chronological order. Reinspection will be conducted within 10 days.
Correct By: Correct Prior To Reinspection,Repeat Violations: 2nd
Violation #: 25
Repeat Violation
Description: Consumer Advisory Provided for Raw or Undercooked Food
Comments:
Priority Foundation-3-603.11, Pf: Consumption of Animal Foods that are Raw, Undercooked, or Not Otherwise Processed to Eliminate Pathogens. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4125/Food-SafetyOperator-Resources.---Observed the establishment having a consumer advisory in their menu but not having any indication to which food on the menu it pertains to. Establishment was observed offering partially cooked salmon. Discussed the importance of having some kind of indication such as an asterisk to indicate which food can be served with partially cooked/raw animal proteins. Reinspection will be conducted within 10 days.
Correct By: Correct Prior To Reinspection,Repeat Violations: 2nd
Comments/Details
Reinspection will be conducted within 10 days.
No County legal action will result from this inspection.
Inspection rights accepted by Donna M.
Inspection report emailed and confirmed by person in charge.
Award: Re-Inspection,Food Manager Licenses: 1,Signer: Donna M.
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.