Inspection Report
Ralph's Snack Bar
4535 W VAN BUREN ST PHOENIX AZ 85043
MF-10-0518
Mobile Food Annual - MF Type 3
Mobile Food Routine Inspection
6/11/2025
Not Participating
0
Completed
Violations
Violation #: 22
Description: Proper Cold Holding Temperatures
Comments:
Observed the reach-in refrigerators' temperature at 70*F at the time of inspection. The PIC (Person in Charge) was informed that all cooling units must be able to keep at 41*F or below in order to ensure food safety. PIC put in a work order to have fridge fixed at the time of inspection. Onsite mechanics repaired unit to compliant temperature of <41*F.
Corrective Action: Corrected at the time of inspection.
PRIORITY VIOLATION-3-501.16(A)(2) and (B) - Priority: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Cold Holding. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you.https://www.maricopa.gov/4576/AMC-Toolbox---Cold-Holding.
Violation #: 33
Description: Proper Cooling Methods Used; Adequate Equipment for Temperature Control
Comments:
4-301.11 - Priority Foundation: Cooling, Heating, and Holding Capacities-Equipment. For a permanent fix to this violation, check out these simple tools in our Active Managerial Control Toolbox, made especially for you. https://www.maricopa.gov/4617/AMC-Toolbox---Cooling. Addl Notes: Observed the reach-in refrigerators' temperature at 70*F at the time of inspection. The PIC (Person in Charge) was informed that all cooling units must be able to keep at 41*F or below in order to ensure food safety. PIC put in a work order to have fridge fixed at the time of inspection. Onsite mechanics repaired unit to compliant temperature of <41*F. Corrective Action: Corrected at the time of inspection.
Violation #: 47
Description: Food and Non-Food-Contact Surfaces Cleanable, Properly Designed, Constructed and Used
Comments:
4-501.11 - Core: Good Repair and Proper Adjustment-Equipment Addl Notes: Observed a broken handle for the reach-in fridge unit at the time of inspection. PIC was informed that the handle must be fixed in order to have a proper seal for the fridge to ensure that the temperature inside can be kept at 41*F or below. PIC entered a work order at the time of inspection. Corrective Action: Correct prior to next routine inspection.
Violation #: 56
Description: Adequate Ventilation and Lighting; Designated Areas Used
Comments:
6-202.11 - Core: Light Bulbs, Protective Shielding Addl Notes: Observed no protective shielding for all four light fixtures on the roof of the unit. The PIC was informed that the bulbs require protection in the chance they were to burst, protecting the employees and food alike from potential glass shards. PIC entered a work order at the time of inspection. Corrective Action: Correct prior to next routine inspection.
Comments/Details
No County legal action will result from this inspection.
"A" for Food Safety
Through our grading system, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department provides at-a-glance indications of how food establishments perform during food safety inspections. This system is designed to grade food establishments in terms of food safety requirements and provide recognition to those who choose to participate.
How does it work?
The issuance of grade cards to food establishments is based on voluntary participation. The person in charge, who is present during the inspection, will be asked whether they would like to participate in the Grading System. This will be decided prior to each inspection. If an establishment does not participate in the Grading System, Not Participating or NP will appear on the inspection report, and the inspection will still occur. If an establishment does participate, a grade of A, B, C, or D will be determined at the conclusion of the inspection using the Grading System chart below. Participating establishments will then be provided with a grade card that can be posted in the establishment. The status of the establishment’s grade will also appear on the Restaurant Ratings page of the department’s website.
How can I determine the grade?
The Grading System chart can be used to determine grades earned for establishments that do not participate. Grades are determined by the number of Priority and Priority Foundation violations received at the time of inspection. Violation types are defined in general terms below.
Definitions
- Priority Violation
- Major violation that directly contributes to increasing the risk of foodborne illness or injury (e.g. Food employees do not properly wash hands when required).
- Priority Foundation Violation
- Minor violation that does not directly contribute to an increased risk of foodborne illness but failure to correct this violation may lead to the occurrence of a priority violation. For example, hand washing soap and paper towels not available at hand wash sink (may lead directly to food employees not properly washing hands when required).
- Core Violation
- Minor violation that relates to general maintenance and sanitation (e.g. No sign reminding employees to wash hands).
- Cutting Edge Program
- All county food-related establishments can partner with Maricopa County to implement a proactive approach to reducing foodborne illness risk factors by implementing food safety systems that include policies, training, and verification processes. Partners enrolled in the Cutting Edge Program receive an A+ when an A is earned.
| Violation Category | Grade A | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade B | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade C | Grade D | Grade D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | more than 2 | more than 3 |
| Priority Foundation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | more than 3 | more than 0 |
Any legal action for a pattern of non-compliance or permit suspension results in a D.